← Back to crisis

Active Iran-US/Israel Military Conflict

Ontological Anatomy

15 layers 9 actors 6 resources 5 thresholds 4 feedback loops 6 phases 5 precedents 6 visibility gaps 6 events 5 scenarios 4 resolution paths 2 claims

Ontology Depth

72 elements
Ontology completeness 100%

10 of 10 sections populated

👥 Actors
9
📦 Resources
6
🌍 Physical Environment
24
🔗 Supply Chains
3
⚠ Thresholds
5
🔄 Feedback Loops
4
⏳ Phases
6
📜 Precedents
5
👁 Visibility Gaps
6
📊 Meta Assessment
4

United States Armed Forces (CENTCOM)

state bureaucratic
active
Capabilities
  • • Three carrier strike groups deployed (USS Abraham Lincoln, USS Gerald R. Ford, USS George H.W. Bush) with combined air wing of 200+ strike aircraft
  • • Tomahawk cruise missile inventory: 4,000+ ship- and submarine-launched; proven against hardened Iranian targets in June 2025 and February 2026
  • • B-2 Spirit stealth bombers with 30,000-lb GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busters; used against Fordow and Natanz underground facilities
  • • Cyber offensive capability: established implants in Iranian infrastructure; executed largest wartime cyberattack against Iran on March 15, 2026
  • • ISR constellation: signals intelligence, satellite imagery, MQ-9 Reaper drones providing persistent surveillance across theater
  • • Ballistic missile defense: Aegis-equipped destroyers (USS McFaul, USS Mitscher in Strait of Hormuz) with SM-3 and SM-6 interceptors
Vulnerabilities
  • • Force sustainability: largest Middle East deployment since 2003 Iraq invasion strains rotation schedules and logistics
  • • Forward bases in range of Iranian ballistic missiles (Al Udeid, Qatar; Al Dhafra, UAE; Camp Arifjan, Kuwait)
  • • Cyber exposure: March 15 Iranian cyberattack was largest wartime cyber event against US in history
  • • Domestic war fatigue and political division over open-ended conflict
  • • Simultaneous great-power competition with China in Indo-Pacific constrains force allocation
Interests
  • • Prevent Iranian nuclear weapons capability
  • • Maintain freedom of navigation through Strait of Hormuz
  • • Protect Gulf allies and forward-deployed forces
  • • Domestic political pressure to demonstrate decisive action ahead of 2026 midterms
Resources Controlled
  • • Strategic Petroleum Reserve: approximately 400 million barrels (pre-IEA release)
  • • Persian Gulf naval dominance (surface and subsurface)
  • • Intelligence sharing networks (Five Eyes, bilateral with Israel and Gulf states)
  • • Dollar-denominated energy markets and SWIFT financial system

Islamic Republic of Iran / Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

state bureaucratic
active
Capabilities
  • • Largest ballistic missile arsenal in Middle East: 3,000+ missiles; roughly half of launchers still intact after five weeks of strikes (per CNN/US intelligence, April 2026)
  • • Strait of Hormuz denial: naval mines, anti-ship cruise missiles (Noor, Ghader), fast attack craft, shore-based missile batteries along 1,500 km of Gulf coastline
  • • Proxy network spanning Lebanon (Hezbollah), Yemen (Houthis), Iraq (PMF/Kata'ib Hezbollah), Syria, Gaza — enabling multi-front pressure
  • • Cyber warfare: 53+ active pro-Iranian threat groups tracked in March 2026; MOIS-linked Handala Hack targeted Israeli defense and US medical infrastructure
  • • Underground tunnel network and hardened facilities; Pickaxe Mountain near Natanz under construction, untargeted by US/Israel
  • • Drone program: Shahed-136 one-way attack drones, combat-proven in Ukraine and direct use against Israel
Vulnerabilities
  • • Leadership decapitation: Supreme Leader Khamenei killed February 28; succession uncertainty
  • • Navy largely destroyed; IRGC naval forces at roughly 50% capability
  • • Air force obsolete: fleet of 1970s-era F-4 Phantoms, F-5 Tigers, and F-14 Tomcats; no match for US/Israeli air superiority
  • • Economic isolation: sanctions, oil export disruption, inflation exceeding 50%
  • • Air defense gaps: S-300 systems damaged in June 2025; replacement Antey-2500 from Russia not yet delivered
  • • Dependence on Chinese sodium perchlorate imports for solid-fuel missile production
Interests
  • • Regime survival after Khamenei assassination and leadership decapitation
  • • Maintain nuclear hedging capability (estimated 440 kg of 60%-enriched uranium pre-June 2025, current status unknown)
  • • Preserve territorial integrity and project regional influence
  • • Demonstrate cost-imposition to deter future strikes
Resources Controlled
  • • Strait of Hormuz choke leverage (mines, shore batteries, geography)
  • • Proxy forces across four countries
  • • Remaining nuclear material and enrichment knowledge (IAEA lost continuity of knowledge)
  • • Domestic industrial base for missile and drone production

State of Israel / Israel Defense Forces

state rational
active
Capabilities
  • • Multi-layered missile defense: Iron Dome (short-range), David's Sling (medium-range), Arrow 2/3 (ballistic); 86-90% intercept rate in June 2025; Arrow 4 deploying in 2026
  • • F-35I Adir stealth strike aircraft; 200+ fighter jets used in February 28 opening strikes
  • • Intelligence penetration: demonstrated ability to locate and kill Khamenei and senior IRGC leadership
  • • Cyber offensive: Unit 8200 capabilities, including Stuxnet precedent
  • • Undeclared nuclear deterrent (estimated 80-90 warheads per SIPRI)
  • • Ground forces: IDF entered southern Lebanon on March 16, advancing past Naqoura toward Bayada
Vulnerabilities
  • • Geographic size: 22,145 km2 total area; entire country within Iranian medium-range missile envelope
  • • Iron Dome interceptor cost asymmetry: each Tamir missile costs $40,000-$100,000 vs. $500-2,000 per incoming rocket
  • • Multi-front exposure: simultaneous operations against Iran, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and residual Gaza threats
  • • Interceptor stockpile depletion: sustained barrages from Hezbollah (200+ rockets in single salvos) strain inventory
  • • Economic disruption: repeated sheltering of hundreds of thousands of northern residents
Interests
  • • Permanently eliminate Iranian nuclear threat
  • • Neutralize Hezbollah and northern front rocket threat
  • • Establish regional deterrence dominance
  • • Domestic security: 25 fatalities from Iranian strikes (19 civilian, 6 military) drives political pressure for decisive action
Resources Controlled
  • • Regional air superiority
  • • Intelligence networks across Middle East
  • • US strategic alliance and resupply pipeline
  • • Mediterranean gas fields (Leviathan, Tamar)

Ansar Allah (Houthi movement)

organization instinctive
active
Capabilities
  • • Iranian-supplied anti-ship ballistic missiles (Asef, Tankil) with 200+ km range
  • • Sea-skimming cruise missiles and one-way attack drones covering southern Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb approaches
  • • Demonstrated ability to strike Israeli territory (March 28 missile attack)
  • • Control of western Yemen including Red Sea coastline and port of Hodeidah
  • • Strategic patience: maintained operational pause for three weeks after Feb 28, waiting for Iranian coordination signal
Vulnerabilities
  • • Dependent on Iranian arms supply pipeline which is now disrupted
  • • Hodeidah port and coastal positions vulnerable to US naval strikes
  • • Limited air defense against precision strikes
  • • Internal governance capacity limited; controlling territory is resource-intensive
Interests
  • • Solidarity with Iran as primary patron and arms supplier
  • • Leverage Red Sea disruption for political recognition and sanctions relief
  • • Consolidate control over Yemen against Saudi-backed government
Resources Controlled
  • • Bab el-Mandeb strait harassment capability (12% of global trade by value, 4.8 million barrels/day of oil, approximately 19,000 vessels/year)
  • • Western Yemen territory and population
  • • Missile and drone stockpiles of unknown but significant size

Hezbollah

organization bureaucratic
active
Capabilities
  • • Fired 200 rockets and 20 drones in single salvo on March 2; maintained sustained fire through March 31
  • • Pre-war rocket and missile stockpile estimated at 100,000-150,000 (degraded from 2024-2025 Israeli operations)
  • • Precision-guided munitions capability: Fateh-110 derivatives threatening Israeli infrastructure
  • • Integrated operations with IRGC: March 2 described as 'joint and integrated operation' with simultaneous ballistic missile launches
  • • Tunnel infrastructure in southern Lebanon
Vulnerabilities
  • • Severe leadership losses from 2024-2025 Israeli campaign (Nasrallah, senior military council)
  • • IDF ground operations advancing through southern Lebanon since March 16
  • • Lebanese government demanded Hezbollah disarm and restrict to political activities (PM Salam)
  • • Civilian population fatigue in southern Lebanon
  • • Rocket failures: 80 out of 200 rockets failed to enter Israel in March 2 salvo (40% failure rate)
Interests
  • • Organizational survival after 2024-2025 decimation of senior leadership
  • • Maintain relevance as Iran's primary regional deterrent
  • • Prevent further Israeli ground advances in southern Lebanon
Resources Controlled
  • • Rocket and missile inventory (degraded but still substantial)
  • • Southern Lebanon territorial control (contested)
  • • Political representation in Lebanese parliament

People's Republic of China

state rational
active
Capabilities
  • • Largest buyer of Iranian oil: 11.7 million barrels shipped through Hormuz since Feb 28, all destined for China
  • • Strategic petroleum reserve of approximately 1.2 billion barrels (109 days of seaborne import cover)
  • • Teapot refinery network processing sanctioned crude outside formal channels
  • • Diplomatic leverage: UN Security Council veto, Belt and Road relationships with Iran and Gulf states
  • • Critical supplier of sodium perchlorate to Iran's solid-fuel missile program
  • • Rejected snapback sanctions legality alongside Russia
Vulnerabilities
  • • Energy import dependence: 97% of Taiwan's energy imported, with Taiwan producing 90% of advanced semiconductors
  • • LNG supply vulnerability through Strait of Hormuz
  • • Diplomatic balancing act: cannot openly back Iran without jeopardizing Gulf state relationships
  • • Domestic economic slowdown limits tolerance for sustained high energy prices
Interests
  • • Maintain access to Middle Eastern oil (approximately 50% of China's crude imports transit Gulf)
  • • Prevent US unipolar dominance in Middle East energy architecture
  • • Avoid economic disruption to domestic growth targets
  • • Stockpile energy at below-market prices during crisis
Resources Controlled
  • • World's largest strategic petroleum reserve (by volume)
  • • Dominant buyer leverage over sanctioned oil markets
  • • UN Security Council veto
  • • Manufacturing supply of missile precursor chemicals
Consensus Views
institutional-distrust: Quiet beneficiary of the crisis — buying discounted oil and expanding strategic leverage while publicly calling for peace

Russian Federation

state rational
active
Capabilities
  • • Arms supplier: Antey-2500 air defense system (improved S-300 variant) offered to Iran; 500 Verba MANPADS launchers under EUR 500M contract (2027-2029 delivery)
  • • 48 Su-35 fighter jets contracted for delivery 2026-2028
  • • Diplomatic cover: rejected snapback sanctions, continued arms deals
  • • Energy market beneficiary: Russian oil fills gap from Iranian supply disruption
  • • Intelligence sharing with Iran (extent unknown but relationship deepened since 2022)
Vulnerabilities
  • • Own military resources stretched by Ukraine conflict
  • • Arms deliveries to Iran strain production capacity already committed to own forces
  • • Secondary sanctions risk on Russian entities involved in Iran arms trade
  • • Limited naval presence in Persian Gulf; cannot project force into theater
Interests
  • • Maintain Iran as strategic partner and arms customer
  • • Benefit from elevated oil prices (Russian budget breakeven approximately $70/barrel)
  • • Divert US military attention and resources from Europe/Ukraine
  • • Prevent US from establishing uncontested Middle East dominance
Resources Controlled
  • • Advanced air defense and fighter aircraft production
  • • UN Security Council veto
  • • Alternative oil supply for European and Asian markets
  • • Military-technical expertise and spare parts for Soviet-era Iranian equipment

Gulf Cooperation Council States (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar)

state bureaucratic
active
Capabilities
  • • Combined sovereign wealth exceeding $4 trillion (Saudi PIF, Abu Dhabi ADIA/Mubadala, Qatar QIA, Kuwait KIA)
  • • Oil production capacity: Saudi Arabia alone can surge to approximately 12.5 million barrels/day
  • • US military basing: Al Udeid (Qatar), Al Dhafra (UAE), Camp Arifjan (Kuwait)
  • • Air forces with F-15, F-16, Eurofighter Typhoon, Rafale fleets
  • • THAAD and Patriot missile defense deployments
Vulnerabilities
  • • Oil infrastructure within Iranian missile range: 2019 Abqaiq/Khurais attack removed 5.7 million barrels/day temporarily
  • • Direct Iranian strikes on Gulf state territory after Feb 28 broke neutrality premise
  • • Expatriate labor force vulnerable to evacuation pressure
  • • Caught between US alliance demands and economic relationship with China
  • • Internal divisions: Oman advocates earliest peace; UAE/Saudi shifting to anti-Iran stance
Interests
  • • Prevent Iranian regional hegemony and direct military threat
  • • Protect oil infrastructure (Abqaiq, Ras Tanura, Kharg Island equivalent facilities)
  • • Maintain US security umbrella without being drawn into direct combat
  • • Economic diversification plans (Vision 2030, UAE 2071) depend on stability
Resources Controlled
  • • Approximately 30% of global proven oil reserves
  • • Spare oil production capacity (most significant global buffer)
  • • Sovereign wealth funds providing fiscal resilience
  • • Desalination infrastructure (95% of Gulf freshwater)
  • • Qatar: 33% of global helium output, second-largest LNG supplier

Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) / Kata'ib Hezbollah

organization bureaucratic
active
Capabilities
  • • Rocket and drone attacks on US bases in Iraq (Al Asad, Erbil)
  • • IED and indirect fire capability along US supply routes
  • • Integration with Iraqi state security apparatus
  • • Iranian-supplied ballistic missile components and UAVs
Vulnerabilities
  • • Embedded within Iraqi state: attacks on US forces risk Iraqi government complicity charges
  • • US precision strike capability against leadership targets
  • • Iraqi public opinion divided on being drawn into Iran's war
Interests
  • • Expel US forces from Iraq
  • • Maintain Iranian-aligned political influence in Baghdad
  • • Demonstrate solidarity with Tehran without triggering full US retaliation on Iraq
Resources Controlled
  • • Militia forces estimated at 100,000-150,000 fighters
  • • Iraqi parliamentary seats and ministerial positions
  • • Control of border crossings and smuggling routes
← Crisis detail All anatomies →